lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Elschot <paul.elsc...@xs4all.nl>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-584) Decouple Filter from BitSet
Date Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:20:04 GMT
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 17:41, eks dev wrote:
> 
> If I remember well, the last time we profiled search with "high density"  OR 
queries  scoring was taking up to 30% of the time. This was a 8Mio collection 
of short documents fitting comfortably in RAM. So I am sure disabling scoring 
in some cases could bring us something. 
> 
> I am not all that familiar with scoring inner workings to stand 100% behind 
this statement, so please take it with some healthy reserve.

For "high density OR" I'd guess most of the work was spent maintaining
the priority queue by document number. See also LUCENE-730 .

> 
> But anyhow, with Matcher in place, we have at least a chance to prove it 
brings something for this scenario. For Filtering case it brings definitely a 
lot. 
> 
> on the other note, 
> Paul, would it be possible/easy to have something like. It looks easy to add 
it, but I may be missing something: 
> BooleanQuery.add(Matcher mtr,
>     BooleanClause.Occur occur)

That's one of the things I'd like to see added. It would allow a single
ConjunctionScorer to do a filtered search for a query with some
required terms.

Regards,
Paul Elschot


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message