Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47525 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2007 07:50:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2007 07:50:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 47098 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2007 07:51:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 46937 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2007 07:51:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 46923 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2007 07:51:00 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:51:00 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [169.229.70.167] (HELO rescomp.berkeley.edu) (169.229.70.167) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:50:51 -0700 Received: by rescomp.berkeley.edu (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 556AF5B763; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rescomp.berkeley.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F8C77F403 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:50:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Hostetter To: Lucene-Dev Subject: Re: non indexed field query clauses? help wanted In-Reply-To: <789D9A82-7E1E-4FA0-990C-46D29757F41A@ix.netcom.com> Message-ID: References: <789D9A82-7E1E-4FA0-990C-46D29757F41A@ix.netcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org : Has anyone thought again about having a query clause that operated on : stored (non-indexed) values? what would be the motivation/use case for this? ... i'm having a hard time imagining situations where if some mechanism did exist, it would be more useful then just indexing the field value (un_tokenized if neccessary) ? -Hoss --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org