lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yonik Seeley" <yo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-843) improve how IndexWriter uses RAM to buffer added documents
Date Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:26:31 GMT
On 3/22/07, Michael McCandless <lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> We say that
> developers should not rely on docIDs but people still seem to rely on
> their monotonic ordering (even though they change).

Yes.  If the benefits of removing that guarantee are large enough, we
could consider dumping it... but not in Lucene 2.x IMO.  We should see
how people are using this, and if there are acceptable workarounds.
Solr's current dependence on document ordering could me removed.

-Yonik

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message