Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 63350 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2007 16:36:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2007 16:36:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 61788 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2007 16:36:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 61728 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2007 16:36:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 61692 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2007 16:36:12 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:36:12 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.55.225.129] (HELO ehatchersolutions.com) (69.55.225.129) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:36:00 -0800 Received: by ehatchersolutions.com (Postfix, from userid 504) id 8569930EFC17; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:35:40 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on javelina X-Spam-Level: Received: from [128.143.193.79] (d-128-193-79.bootp.Virginia.EDU [128.143.193.79]) by ehatchersolutions.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B792830EFC16 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:35:30 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: References: <1171478882.29510.1174647745@webmail.messagingengine.com> <02BDCC79-186B-420A-84AA-FC7D3A8C4ECA@apache.org> <650945C6-7881-4E0B-AC6E-D0C7805C56D3@ehatchersolutions.com> <398EE1BE-33F6-4276-94A5-03DE354694B1@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <602BCE82-BE2A-44A7-B8B6-05794887540E@ehatchersolutions.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Erik Hatcher Subject: Re: [VOTE] release Lucene 2.1 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:35:27 -0500 To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.1 I vote for release of 2.1 as-is... no one really uses that demo stuff anyway. I'll tackle the binary custom demo build.xml file as soon as I can and commit that. When folks complain, we can point them to the new build.xml file and they'll just plop that into a 2.1 binary release and it'll work. Erik On Feb 15, 2007, at 11:21 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On 2/15/07, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >> What's weird, is I don't think much has changed build wise from the >> last release, yet we all of a sudden noticed all these things. > > Yes, I just verified that things are pretty much in the same shape in > the 2.0.0 release. > contrib/(ant, lucli, regex) fail to build from the src dist. > > -Yonik > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org