lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yonik Seeley" <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] release Lucene 2.1
Date Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:04:51 GMT
OK, I've removed the raw jar, and a maven release will have to wait
until someone fixes things up.  The normal release can proceed.

I promised to be release-manager-lite... I'll do the release
mechanics, but I don't currently have time to do much else.


On 2/14/07, Steven Parkes <> wrote:
> I'm new to the release process, so I'm trying to understand it at the
> same time as checking out the candidate.
> One thing I noticed is that the raw jar doesn't contain LICENSE or
> NOTICE files, a la To wit:
>         Can I Distribute A Raw Artifact?
>         ASF distributions typically contain additional material together
> with the artifacts. This material may include documentation concerning
> the release but must contain LICENSE and NOTICE files.
>         Raw artifacts may be distributed if they contain LICENSE and
> NOTICE files. For example, the java artifact format is based on a
> compressed directory structure and those projects wishing to distribute
> raw jars place LICENSE and NOTICE files in the META-INF directory within
> the jar.
> I was also wondering about highlighting the impact of the index file
> format change somewhere obvious ... though I don't now where that would
> be. Perhaps in the release announcement?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message