lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yonik Seeley" <yo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: NewIndexModifier - - - DeletingIndexWriter
Date Fri, 09 Feb 2007 20:49:55 GMT
On 2/9/07, Doug Cutting <cutting@apache.org> wrote:
> Michael McCandless wrote:
> > I agree extensions points are nice.  Maybe we could leave the
> > extension points ("doAfterFlushRamSegments", etc.) but merge
> > NewIndexModifier into IndexWriter?
> >
> > Though I do worry that by adding these extension points we tie our
> > hands for later.
>
> I think this is a valid concern.  Can the extension points be kept
> package-private?  It makes them awkward to use, since non-core code must
> add things in org.apache.lucene.index.

As long as you wouldn't object to a org.apache.lucene package in Solr...
With the understanding of course, that the onus would be on Solr developers
to keep up with any changes.

-Yonik

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message