Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of yseeley@gmail.com designates
 66.249.92.168 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=VK4d3X8DUoSsAybNXwQI/AeE8NleWDkcwNFhDenZ4Lly6igvVl3yuXEYdXDUQibZ/TH6Vz0zEdKPnEvXJMlVrPEgGbTcIf/kM4zN1IVxsxPB34lsZViuJHfezQ1vHoxQ52yH5GvYFmLsYdX7clI6Rxi60r1WQwrcnor+MamrFdQ=
Message-ID: <c68e39170612111226k1bfaeb43k5da8f13a1e446415@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:26:35 -0500
From: "Yonik Seeley" <yonik@apache.org>
Sender: yseeley@gmail.com
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Exposing IndexReader commit()
In-Reply-To: <20061204223520.77683.qmail@web50306.mail.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20061204223520.77683.qmail@web50306.mail.yahoo.com>

Hi Otis,

What is your real usecase here?  Is it to make sure deletes are
flushed in the event of a crash?  Otherwise I don't see the problem
with delaying deletes.

-Yonik
http://incubator.apache.org/solr Solr, the open-source Lucene search server


On 12/4/06, Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodnetic@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm wondering about opening up commit() in IndexReader.  It's currently "protected".
>
> We'd like to be able to control the flushing of deletes to disk, and it looks like that's what IndexReader's commit() does.  We tried extending SegmentReader with our own version that overrides commit() and let's us call it.  This worked for indices with a single segment, because they are read by SegmentReader.  However, this didn't work with multi-segment indices, because unlike SegmentReader, MultiReader doesn't know how to dynamically load a custom MultiReader.
> Both SegmentReader and MultiReader extend IndexReader, which contains that protected commit().
>
> Next, we thought we'd try extending IndexReader and using our own IndexReader, but since Segment|MultiReader extend IndexReader directly, I don't think this approach would work.
>
> In the end, we just made commit() public in IndexReader, and solved our problem for both single and multi-segment indices.
>
> Is there a better way to control flushing to disk without closing and re-opening an IndexReader, which is more expensive than just commit()ing.
> If not, what do you think about making commit() public and javadocing it with "Expert:...."?
>
> Thanks,
> Otis

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org