Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 73078 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2006 06:29:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Dec 2006 06:29:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 3450 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2006 06:29:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 3414 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2006 06:29:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 3403 invoked by uid 99); 13 Dec 2006 06:29:54 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:29:54 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of lukas.vlcek@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.188] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:29:44 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n28so738921nfc for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:29:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=QntZ0qV8VAFQK5KHY96EqtJRRcmT8Db1o+lh92JnUUyM1FzYTBXQjCKvOb6SESWaoicPrDp6t++Bcsxp3r9pf6F3I4wwsi490kmPO5LIvKWSEnmBB1YzNjEV9jIsOHfX90chCywtYlWgGcyzTFPfxjS/gsAZ36r55F0dGU+wWNc= Received: by 10.82.120.14 with SMTP id s14mr83741buc.1165991362334; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:29:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.147.11 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:29:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52c3ddca0612122229x1a324f80qf6525bf79e0010d6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 07:29:22 +0100 From: "Lukas Vlcek" Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Lucene code review In-Reply-To: <20061213060052.13427.qmail@web50301.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_147350_10395726.1165991362307" References: <20061213060052.13427.qmail@web50301.mail.yahoo.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_147350_10395726.1165991362307 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi, Indeed, I am very impressed by the fact that both the Nutch and Lucene scored best of all considered project in the survey. Congratulations to the community! Lukas On 12/13/06, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > > Just spotted this on Slashdot: > http://opensource.fortifysoftware.com/welcome.html > I wonder what the 3 defects they found and reviewed are... I don't see a > way to see them from their site. > > Otis > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org > > ------=_Part_147350_10395726.1165991362307--