lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yonik Seeley" <yo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Exposing IndexReader commit()
Date Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:59:29 GMT
On 12/11/06, Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodnetic@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I believe (another colleague did work around this) the use case is the desire to flush
the deletes without having to close the reader and reopen it, which is expensive because of
FieldCache population.

Yes, but that doesn't answer *why* deletes must be flushed now as
opposed to later.
What's the higher level use-case behind needing to flush the deletes?

-Yonik

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message