lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Doug Cutting <>
Subject Re: Attached proposed modifications to Lucene 2.0 to support Field.Store.Encrypted
Date Wed, 06 Dec 2006 00:07:16 GMT
negrinv wrote:
> there is a third way Doug,  and it's for me to stop trying to be polite by
> answering all the questions that I am being asked, then nobody will get
> upset by my replies. If the decision is for no encryption at field level, I
> accept it, but I don't believe it should be externalised. Perhaps someone
> else will pick up your offer.

I don't think anyone is upset.  I was trying to provide an alternative 
to giving up and walking away, but, yes, that's an option too.  However, 
if you think field-level encryption is something that lots of folks 
would use, and want to help provide it, it might not be your most 
satisfactory option.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message