From java-dev-return-16420-apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org Fri Nov 03 21:44:06 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 62760 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2006 21:44:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2006 21:44:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 47126 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2006 21:44:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 47081 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2006 21:44:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 47070 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2006 21:44:11 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 13:44:11 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.34.172.19] (HELO ohana.manawiz.com) (64.34.172.19) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 13:43:59 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.47] ([::ffff:72.234.69.162]) (AUTH: LOGIN chuck, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by ohana.manawiz.com with esmtp; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 21:43:37 +0000 id 000EC0C0.454BB809.000079DD Message-ID: <454BB807.9080906@manawiz.com> Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 11:43:35 -1000 From: Chuck Williams Organization: Manawiz User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060927) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: ParallelMultiSearcher reimplementation References: <13F36D2926AD444697093282F20041B704F97C34@buf-ex01.cymfony.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Chris Hostetter wrote on 11/03/2006 09:40 AM: > : Is there any timeline for when Java 1.5 packages will be allowed? > > I don't think i'll incite too much rioting to say "no there is no > timeline" > .. I may incite some rioting by saying "my guess is 1.5 packages will be > supported when the patches requiring them become highly desired. > Not being shy about inciting riots, the problem with this approach is that people using Java 1.5 are discouraged from submitting patches to being with. Doug Cutting wrote on 11/03/2006 08:39 AM: > Please consider breaking these into separate patches, one to permit > ParallelMultiSearcher w/ HitCollector to not be single-threaded, and > another to re-implement things with a thread pool. The latter is more > controversial, and it would be a shame to have the former wait on it. Why would a thread pool be more controversial? Dynamically creating and garbaging threads has many downsides. Chuck --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org