lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chuck Williams <ch...@manawiz.com>
Subject Re: Dynamically varying maxBufferedDocs
Date Thu, 09 Nov 2006 19:10:23 GMT


Chuck Williams wrote on 11/09/2006 08:55 AM:
> Yonik Seeley wrote on 11/09/2006 08:50 AM:
>   
>> For best behavior, you probably want to be using the current
>> (svn-trunk) version of Lucene with the new merge policy.  It ensures
>> there are mergeFactor segments with size <= maxBufferedDocs before
>> triggering a merge.  This makes for faster indexing in the presence of
>> deleted docs or partially full segments.
>>
>>     
>
> I've got quite a few local patches unfortunately.  It will take a while
> to sync up.  If I don't already have this new logic, can I pick it up by
> just merging with the latest IndexWriter or are the changes more extensive?
>   
I must already have the new merge logic as the only diff between my
IndexWriter and latest svn is the change just made to make
flushRamSegments public.

Yonik, thanks for your help.  This should work well!

Chuck


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message