Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22308 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2006 23:28:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Oct 2006 23:28:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 26541 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2006 23:28:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 25976 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2006 23:28:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 25965 invoked by uid 99); 30 Oct 2006 23:28:29 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:28:29 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.116.38.223] (HELO rectangular.com) (68.116.38.223) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:28:12 -0800 Received: from [67.189.26.9] (helo=[10.0.1.3]) by rectangular.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.44) id 1GegeT-000D0c-FK for java-dev@lucene.apache.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:34:45 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <486C28A7-20C5-4C2E-9C2C-E30714E24B1D@rectangular.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Marvin Humphrey Subject: Re: lock path thoughts Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:27:49 -0800 To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Oct 30, 2006, at 3:12 PM, Doron Cohen wrote: > This would be avoided if index locks are maintained in the index > folder. I > searched the lists for previous discussions on this 'design > decision' - > i.e. where the index locks reside - found none. Wouldn't it simplify > matters to have the locks in the index dir? Any disadvantages of this? Doug explains the rationale here: http://xrl.us/svsz (Link to mail-archives.apache.org) Marvin Humphrey Rectangular Research http://www.rectangular.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org