Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 34319 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2006 00:58:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Oct 2006 00:58:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 11172 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2006 17:46:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 11141 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2006 17:46:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 11130 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2006 17:46:45 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:46:45 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [198.144.201.51] (HELO esseff.org) (198.144.201.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:46:33 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by esseff.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F584024EA for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:50:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at esseff.org Received: from esseff.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (esseff.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TmWQYBDZ+agz for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:49:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from professorville.windows.esseff.org (professorville.windows.esseff.org [10.0.1.16]) by esseff.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982094024E2 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:49:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: jira workflow Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:46:08 -0700 Message-ID: <392521EA2692A2418DF48C331E61E32506A93F@professorville.windows.esseff.org> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: jira workflow Thread-Index: Acb4XC36T8rQz46QQXOlkGSyxKfGaAAAPKCw From: "Steven Parkes" To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org svn annotates the jira logs, which is more than a comment, but still not navigable=20 -----Original Message----- From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_lucene@fucit.org]=20 Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:37 AM To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: jira workflow : Since that's not the case now, I'd suggest it's reasonable for a : committer to commit w/o changing the assignee, only changing the state : to resolved. Facilitates communication on issues that might arise later : and helps gauge individual involvement. I guess it depends on how we want to define "Assignee" ... in the past it's allways been committer, I get the idea that we might want to redefine it to be "erson whose done the leg work on the issue validating the bug, reviewing the patch, etc..." but ultimately the person who commits a patch is responsible for those changes, and it seems like we'd want a better way to track that then just a comment. the Subversion logs are by far authoritative, but being able to navigate Jira issues by committeer also seems important. Can we add custom "user pulldown" based fields as easily as the "Patch Available" fields were added? ... just so there's a place to track this? -Hoss --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org