lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Hostetter <hossman_luc...@fucit.org>
Subject Re: releases
Date Thu, 26 Oct 2006 05:20:05 GMT

: I don't recall any commits in the lucene_2_0 branch, I think everything
: since 2.0 has been getting committed in the trunk, and my guess is those
: are just human errors in JIRA.  But I think your interpretation of how
: Fix Versions should be read is correct.

this is the past thread i was thinking about before...

http://www.archivum.info/java-dev@lucene.apache.org/2006-06/msg00012.html

...refering to leaving the release branches clean untill just before a
point release when all the desired changes can get merged in.

allthough now i'm more confused about how exactly "Fix Version" should be
used ... Doug seemed to be advocating one usage in that htread, and a
differnet usage in the more recent thread.

it seems like we really need a wiki on how we *want* to use the various
fields in Jira (assignee, "New", "Pathc available", "Fix Version", etc...)


-Hoss


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message