lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Doug Cutting <>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-679) CLONE -QueryParser is not applicable for the arguments (String, String, Analyzer) error in results.jsp when executing search in the browser (demo from Lucene 2.0)
Date Wed, 18 Oct 2006 20:03:28 GMT
Steven Parkes (JIRA) wrote:
> Hmmm ... I've been wondering about this. Turns out that both the svn tag lucene_2_0_0
and the 2.0.0 src tar ball have "2.0.1-dev" in common-build.xml. I don't know if this was
intentional, so that the someone using the signed binary tar ball would be clearly distinguishable
from something that someone had built? Wouldint think so, but I'm not too up on ASF release

That's the convention we've used in Lucene projects.  The idea is that 
users should have to go out of their way to build something named 
lucene-2.0.0.jar, since they're likely to patch things.  Only the 
official builds should look like official builds, everything else should 
look like a developer build of some version subsequent to the release build.

Yes, this confuses a lot of folks and probably deserves an FAQ.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message