Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 42997 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2006 04:53:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Sep 2006 04:53:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 58277 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2006 04:53:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 58258 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2006 04:53:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 58247 invoked by uid 99); 30 Sep 2006 04:53:25 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.84) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:53:25 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= Received: from [209.237.227.198] ([209.237.227.198:33409] helo=brutus.apache.org) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 2.1.1.8 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 58/82-23383-448FD154 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:53:24 -0700 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7677142DA for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:53:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <11792040.1159592001376.JavaMail.root@brutus> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:53:21 -0700 (PDT) From: "Doron Cohen (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-664) [PATCH] small fixes to the new scoring.html doc In-Reply-To: <28415342.1156345096030.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-664?page=comments#action_12438854 ] Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-664: ------------------------------------ Hi Grant, For part 1, I am ok with having it after the scoring formula. For part 2, my motivation was to make it more clear in: - - what's inside the sum and what's outside (as you said). - - what's decided at indexing time and what's still controllable at search time. - - how boosts and encoding/decoding play in. - - what's fixed and what can be modified, by subclassing, say, DefaultSimilarity. So {indexBoost, searchBoost, normalizer} were the tools to clear this up, and also to make the formula shorter and easier to read in a glance. Naturally, after delving so deep into it is now clear to me, but you are right, it would be good to hear from others how they like this part. Thanks, Doron > [PATCH] small fixes to the new scoring.html doc > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-664 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-664 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Website > Affects Versions: 2.0.1 > Reporter: Michael McCandless > Attachments: boosts_plus_scoring_formula.patch, lucene.uxf, scoring-small-fixes.patch, scoring-small-fixes2.patch, scoring-small-fixes3.patch > > > This is an awesome initiative. We need more docs that cleanly explain the inner workings of Lucene in general... thanks Grant & Steve & others! > I have a few small initial proposed fixes, largely just adding some more description around the components of the formula. But also a couple typos, another link out to Wikipedia, a missing closing ), etc. I've only made it through the "Understanding the Scoring Formula" section so far. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org