lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From robert engels <>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-665) temporary file access denied on Windows
Date Wed, 13 Sep 2006 20:35:43 GMT
Why do we have people writing patches for symptoms? if the developer  
is not keen enough to actually figure out EXACTLY what is causing the  
problem, it is doubtful this same developer should be submitting code  
to "fix" it.

Figure out exactly what is causing YOUR problem and then divulge that  
- then the community at large can diagnose a proper fix. Simple wait  
and retry systems are always fragile (how long to wait? how many  
retries before failing?) and usually VERY site specific (hardware  
speed, etc.)

On Sep 13, 2006, at 3:29 PM, Doron Cohen wrote:

>> eks dev <> wrote on 13/09/2006 13:09:42:
>> would be nice to accept it. Enough people burned
>> their fingers on this one
>>> <> wrote on 13/09/2006 12:52:00:
>>> I've hit this exact issue during development - it's truly
>>> an annoying issue that a simple sleep/retry
>>> loop should resolve.
> Actually this is what the current patch attempts for  
> (FSDirs_Retry_Logic_3)
> - did you get a chance to try it?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message