Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 95747 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2006 20:14:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jul 2006 20:14:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 20397 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2006 20:14:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 20350 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2006 20:14:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 20339 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jul 2006 20:14:55 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:14:55 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of ning.li.li@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.169] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:14:55 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id c2so377398ugf for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:14:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Nzh3tj5l3wFedmBjkRIdcgpO3v6vxSljTh8oBxkbAqaeO7OU8DOMHmPq1CRBD73eexBJvx0894rtSeWlK5khK0QcJyUwakf/RjCMgbfH1CCxLq3Lq7TBavy10VQEaf+m4QH0+BsJtuhHPLsUt8GPh4J/UAbYbA8eghtA8ToMTRU= Received: by 10.78.117.10 with SMTP id p10mr48927huc; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:14:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.169.13 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:14:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:14:33 -0400 From: "Ning Li" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-565) Supporting deleteDocuments in IndexWriter (Code and Performance Results Provided) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <14645793.1152156330186.JavaMail.jira@brutus> <20060707130551.GA10773@fermat.math.technion.ac.il> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > I'm not sure I understand your question.... you mean why would one > want to stick to public APIs? No, that's not what I meant. I definitely agree that we should stick to publich APIs as much as we can. > If it can be done in a separate class, using public APIs (or at least > with a minimum of protected access), without a loss in performance, > then that's the way to go IMO. This is exactly what I'm asking. Can it be done using public APIs without a loss in performance or functionality? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org