lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From robert engels <reng...@ix.netcom.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-565) Supporting deleteDocuments in IndexWriter (Code and Performance Results Provided)
Date Wed, 12 Jul 2006 19:50:31 GMT
You are really starting to lose me here Ning...

I think the sentiments are that there are better, less intrusive ways  
of doing what you are trying to do with the massive changes to  
IndexWriter.

A higher level class that manages the updates can be just as  
efficient if not more so, and far simpler as well.

On Jul 12, 2006, at 2:28 PM, Ning Li wrote:

>> The current implementation makes some assumptions, such as the  
>> "unique
>> key" is a single field, not any sort of compound key, and it doesn't
>> allow deletes by query.  That, coupled with a more complex
>> implementation makes me wary of putting it in IndexWriter.
>
> By "current implementation", you meant Lucene IndexReader in  
> general, right?
>
>> I'll rephrase my original question:
>>  When implementing NewIndexModifier, what type of efficiencies do we
>> get by using the new protected methods of IndexWriter vs using the
>> public APIs of IndexReader and IndexWriter?
>
> What do you think can be best achieved by using the public APIs of
> IndexReader and IndexWriter?
>
> Regards,
> Ning
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message