lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Simon Willnauer (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-631) GData Server - Milestone 3 Patch, Bugfixes, Documentation
Date Tue, 25 Jul 2006 21:54:14 GMT
    [ ] 
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-631:

I found 0 failure  and 2 errors in the test.out this was caused by a missing file in the test
classpath / folder.
I added the file to svn there was just a little "+" missing ;).
Well, I do feel not very well with commiting such huge patches this is quiet error-prone isn't
So how could we improve this procedure for me and for you. I guess we can't get a patch every
day once a week would be quiet good. I would suggest a fix day for me adding a new patch which
gives you a week to commit it. That would make development much easier for me and there will
be less patch mistakes.

Btw. thanks for removing my edited line from the common-build.xml patch, I will add the "clean"
patch again in a minute.

regards simon

> GData Server - Milestone 3 Patch, Bugfixes, Documentation
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-631
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Other
>            Reporter: Simon Willnauer
>         Attachments: common-build.diff, gdata-build_xml.diff, gdata_06_07_23.diff, gdata_06_07_23.diff,
gdata_06_07_25.diff, gdata_06_07_25_schema_added.diff, test.out
> For Milestone 3 added Features:
> - Update Delete Concurrency
> - Version control
> - Second storage impl. based on Db4o. (Distributed Storage)
> - moved all configuration in one single config file.
> - removed dependencies in testcases.
> - added schema validation for and all  xml files in the project (Configuration etc.)
> - added JavaDoc
> - much better Performance after reusing some resources
> - added recovering component to lucene based storage to recover entries after a server
crash or OOM Error (very simple)
> - solved test case fail on hyperthread / multi core machines (@ hossman: give it a go)
> @Yonik && Doug could you get that stuff in the svn please
> regards simon

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
For more information on JIRA, see:


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message