Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 34750 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2006 21:52:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jun 2006 21:52:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 14986 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2006 21:52:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 14940 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2006 21:52:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 14918 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2006 21:52:12 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:52:12 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of simon.willnauer@googlemail.com designates 66.249.92.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.169] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:52:11 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so546146uge for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:51:49 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=googlemail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=mqCfTm1xnEtzpz4JpHDGUvpB5cdqKETdC/c7ho5530i1viqfQ+KHo4WnZCCkf30qbNFg+2RC6I2QDhYkhO7Gz88QkYgzR2BFdo9rmXPjI6JLl1b7o5imwJ6d2yJ6xF7ExFGG+TVUh3mnCZyIog4ejTmc4knAOlozpw9KEQIGdDY= Received: by 10.66.250.17 with SMTP id x17mr1091199ugh; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:51:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.236.1 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:51:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 23:51:49 +0200 From: "Simon Willnauer" Reply-To: simon.willnauer@gmail.com To: "Chris Hostetter" , java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: javadoc compilation problem? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_14508_18971026.1150321909728" References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_14508_18971026.1150321909728 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I had a similar approach to this working on 1.4 but you have been 5 min faster ;) Never mind... I tried yours on java 1.4.2_12 (windows) and blackdown 1.4(linux) it is working fine for my 1.4 JVM's but I do agree with you that we need a better way to deal with 1.5 dependent contib modules. Me and Doug didn't try the javadoc task before committing this. ;( bad idea! Simon On 6/14/06, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > > : I tried building the java doc without any errors using java 5 but > : using 1.4the api doc can not be build. > > the problem is that javadoc has to parse the files to generate the docs, > and the 1.4 javadoc binary doesn't understand the 1.5 syntax. > > I've just commited a change to the build.xml so that it will only attempt > to do the GData javadocs if it detecs that the users is running in a 1.5 > JVM. If a few people could try this out on both 1.4 and 1.5 and sanity > check it for me i'd appreciate it (i did test it, but it's always good to > get a few eye balls) > > I feel it's important to point out, the way i did this feels like a big > freaking hack to me ... if we want to support 1.5 contrib modules moving > forward, we're going to want a more reobust way to deal with this. > > > -Hoss > > ------=_Part_14508_18971026.1150321909728--