Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of lucenelist2005@danielnaber.de
 designates 80.67.18.15 as permitted sender)
From: Daniel Naber <lucenelist2005@danielnaber.de>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r410680 - in /lucene/java/branches/lucene_2_0:
 CHANGES.txt src/jsp/results.jsp
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 22:34:55 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
References: <20060531231219.55856.qmail@web50305.mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060531231219.55856.qmail@web50305.mail.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200606012234.55431@danielnaber.de>

On Donnerstag 01 Juni 2006 01:12, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:

> I saw this commit on trunk. =C2=A0Did you simply make the same change in =
both
> branches/lucene_2_0 and in trunk?

Yes, I copied the changes manually. I would have thought that the person=20
who commits can also best decide whether something should be backported.=20
When someone later merges a a large amount of patches he would need to=20
rely on the changelog entry or study the patch, or am I missing something?

Regards
 Daniel

=2D-=20
http://www.danielnaber.de

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org