From java-dev-return-14534-apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org Sat Jun 17 08:23:24 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30218 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2006 08:23:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2006 08:23:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 6717 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2006 08:23:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 6580 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2006 08:23:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 6569 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2006 08:23:20 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Jun 2006 01:23:20 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [169.229.70.167] (HELO rescomp.berkeley.edu) (169.229.70.167) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Jun 2006 01:23:20 -0700 Received: by rescomp.berkeley.edu (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 28ECA5B763; Sat, 17 Jun 2006 01:22:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rescomp.berkeley.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145A67F403; Sat, 17 Jun 2006 01:22:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 01:22:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Hostetter To: Lucene Dev , george@aroush.net Subject: Lucene.NET Jira Emails? In-Reply-To: <19095952.1150518870419.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Message-ID: References: <19095952.1150518870419.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Is it intentional that the Lucene.NET Jira notifications are being sent to java-dev instead of lucene-net-dev, or is this just a Jira configuration cut/paste mistake? : Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 04:34:30 +0000 (GMT+00:00) : From: "AqD (JIRA)" : Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org : To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org : Subject: [jira] Created: (LUCENENET-7) thread local storage bug in 1.9 : RC1 build 4 : : thread local storage bug in 1.9 RC1 build 4 : ------------------------------------------- : : Key: LUCENENET-7 : URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-7 : Project: Lucene.NET : Type: Bug : : Environment: Windows Server 2003 on VMware, .NET 2.0.50727 : Reporter: AqD : : : Several workarounds for java 1broken thread local storage cause exception in .NET 2 : : Lucene.Net/Index/SegmentReader.cs, line 183 (cause exception) : Lucene.Net/Index/TermInfosReader.cs, line 61 (no exception, but useless?) : : : -- : This message is automatically generated by JIRA. : - : If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: : http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa : - : For more information on JIRA, see: : http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira : : : --------------------------------------------------------------------- : To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org : For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org : -Hoss --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org