lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Engels" <reng...@ix.netcom.com>
Subject RE: Results (Re: Survey: Lucene and Java 1.4 vs. 1.5)
Date Sat, 17 Jun 2006 14:38:46 GMT
Do you have any hard numbers to support this? The last time I checked, gcj
had minimal improvement over JVM 1.5. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Vic Bancroft [mailto:bancroft@america.net] 
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 9:31 AM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Results (Re: Survey: Lucene and Java 1.4 vs. 1.5)

Until there is a free java 5 alternative, it would be nice to have a clean
compile in 1.4.  We might also consider waiting until gcj does the
1.5 move, since some of us are loving the native binaries, particularly on
x86_64.

How else can you index billions of documents (aside from expensive big blue
boxes) . . .

more,
l8r,
v

--
"The future is here. It's just not evenly distributed yet."
 -- William Gibson, quoted by Whitfield Diffie


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message