lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From DM Smith <dmsmith...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Results (Re: Survey: Lucene and Java 1.4 vs. 1.5)
Date Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:45:51 GMT

On Jun 20, 2006, at 6:42 PM, Robert Engels wrote:

> Finding good SWT support on anything but the latest (and major)  
> OS's is
> going to be rather poor and inconsistent. Just check the SWT bugs
> (especially for things like printing).
>
> For a company that seems to want to allow their users to stay in  
> the dark
> ages - good luck with SWT.


This is the major reason we have not done it. We are still in the  
planning phase. SWT keeps getting better and only through testing on  
the platforms on which our users are currently on will we make the  
final decision to switch.


>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DM Smith [mailto:dmsmith555@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 5:24 PM
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Results (Re: Survey: Lucene and Java 1.4 vs. 1.5)
>
>
> On Jun 20, 2006, at 5:21 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
>> On 6/20/06, DM Smith <dmsmith555@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> In any case, there is still GCJ too.  If GCJ supported 1.5, and we
>>>> could make a 1.4 library with Retrotranslator, that should cover
>>> most
>>>> users, right?
>>>
>>> If I am not mistaken: future support for 1.5 in gcj is ambiguous
>>> and/or will be incomplete.
>>
>> You don't use GCJ right?
>
>
> Correct. We couldn't because of our use of Swing. It appears that  
> it is
> sufficiently far along that it is worth trying again. The problem  
> we have is
> trying to explain to users how to install java in order to get our
> application to work. If we could redistribute java as a seamless  
> part of our
> application we would.
>
> We are planning to migrate from Swing to Eclipse's RCP/JFace/SWT  
> and then we
> can and would use GCJ. If Lucene goes to Java 5, we will need to re- 
> examine
> those plans.
>
>
>>
>> GCJ is currently incomplete, and needs patches to get it to work with
>> lucene (and lucene committers have accepted patches to ease this
>> porting in the past).  GCJ support in Lucene isn't  as much for the
>> end-user IMO, but for developers who maintain other Lucene ports.
>>
>> Time will tell how good the Java5 support is for GCJ.  Hopefully less
>> time rather than more ;-)
>>
>>
>> -Yonik
>> http://incubator.apache.org/solr Solr, the open-source Lucene search
>> server
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message