Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 42080 invoked from network); 30 May 2006 14:53:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 May 2006 14:53:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 28895 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2006 14:53:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 28864 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2006 14:53:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 28853 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2006 14:53:04 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 May 2006 07:53:04 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [206.190.38.242] (HELO web50309.mail.yahoo.com) (206.190.38.242) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 30 May 2006 07:53:03 -0700 Received: (qmail 21996 invoked by uid 60001); 30 May 2006 14:52:37 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=xzt734ZDAtDPQg0V1C/e+2QgvcsT85HuW8KCYas25Tl+NAWUZg4xTgvGYhfJSPy8ddJwXOM9HP0Xe37vt4nvqMeM9sIM5lr/9wDZz2S7UvUbp0MA2FsVr2kTOoe3VQH7W0aaFrka8b97XIjE8WD57ViF5N7bPZ3mKTaptv4c6rY= ; Message-ID: <20060530145237.21994.qmail@web50309.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 07:52:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Otis Gospodnetic Reply-To: Otis Gospodnetic Subject: Re: Lucene and Java 1.5 To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org In-Reply-To: <06May29.231712pdt."58641"@synergy1.parc.xerox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Just use 2.0.* for GCJ. New Lucene releases are made every half a year at best. It will be a while before we have 2.1. By that time GCJ may be up to speed. Otis ----- Original Message ---- From: Bill Janssen To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Cc: Otis Gospodnetic Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 11:17:04 PM Subject: Re: Lucene and Java 1.5 My concern is really with the use of GCJ with Lucene. I'd hate to see Lucene core releases that couldn't be used with the latest "stable" release of GCJ. Unfortunately, it's very hard to know what that means. What's the latest version of GCJ? What Java language features are supported in it? It's impossible to tell from the GCJ home page. Bill > : Boy, I'd sure like to see at least one bug-fix release for 2.0 > : maintain java 1.4 compatibility. Would that be 2.1? > > : Could be 2.0.*. I think that is what Hoss was saying, too. > > Yes, that was my point ... as far as i can tell, Lucene bug fix releases > have historically been at the "third level" of the release number: 1.4.1, > 1.4.2, and 1.4.3 were all bug fixes on the 1.4 release branch. 1.9.1 was > a bug fix on the 1.9 release branch. > > I'm suggesting there may be any number of 2.0.X bug fixing releases on the > 2.0 branch which will all be java1.4 compatible. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org