Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3649 invoked from network); 7 May 2006 18:12:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 May 2006 18:12:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 70940 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2006 18:12:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 70904 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2006 18:12:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 70889 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2006 18:12:04 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 May 2006 11:12:04 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [206.190.38.58] (HELO web50304.mail.yahoo.com) (206.190.38.58) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 07 May 2006 11:12:04 -0700 Received: (qmail 74709 invoked by uid 60001); 7 May 2006 18:11:43 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1ySIrcwVGn3q6sty0dtmX2o6rlqmmFxjJTq2D1+q7ttIr3G0xiTuxkqOL9OTycU3X+e435TB0H2bKhNeE8ySiGvVc7hFzuPo4L7+iNBIFjhR/OikIYsAQGc3H4SME9Cn4rxEw54yYYW2nRolOVfjRjdaAwBJmn7QrHw+3kTbxnU= ; Message-ID: <20060507181143.74707.qmail@web50304.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 11:11:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Otis Gospodnetic Reply-To: Otis Gospodnetic Subject: Re: 2.0 release To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org In-Reply-To: <20060507180842.88962.qmail@web50301.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Duh, sorry for the noise. I didn't see that attachment in the other message. It looks like it wasn't stripped after all. Otis ----- Original Message ---- From: Otis Gospodnetic To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Sent: Sunday, May 7, 2006 11:08:42 AM Subject: Re: 2.0 release Murat, The mailing list software strips attachments. You may want to post this somewhere and send the URL. Thanks, Otis ----- Original Message ---- From: Murat.Yakici@cis.strath.ac.uk To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Cc: Otis Gospodnetic Sent: Sunday, May 7, 2006 9:27:34 AM Subject: Re: 2.0 release Previously, I replied to another thread on Vectors. The attached .xsl file which shows avg. msec. for changing buffer sizes, reported from an experiment on TREC collection. This might help for a decision. Cheers, Murat > I recall somebody (Doug, I think, but I could be wrong) trying different > buffer sizes and reporting insignificant performance changes. But please > provide a patch in the JIRA issue, and people can vote for it, if they > like it. > > Otis > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Tatu Saloranta > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org; Maxim Patramanskij > Sent: Saturday, May 6, 2006 7:11:42 PM > Subject: Re: 2.0 release > > --- Maxim Patramanskij wrote: > >> Currently, buffer sizes for BufferedIndexInput and >> BufferedIndexOutput are equals and have constant >> size of 1024 bytes. >> >> When using a database for index persistence, it >> slowdowns performance much >> because of relatively small buffer size. With >> JDBCDirectory and buffer >> size increased from 1Kb to 16Kb I got 200%(3 times) >> performance >> increase for indexing. >> >> What about adding a possibility to change buffer >> size on runtime, that >> client code can set appropriate values depending on >> what persistence >> type for indexing is used? > > Adding configurability is good, and also changing the > default value to be bit more optimal would be even > better? Just changing default to 2k or 4k (4k is close > to a physical page size, might be good default?) might > be worth doing as well. > I mean, 90% of users probably use things exactly as > they are configured by default; so this would probably > make many Lucene users happy. ;-) > > -+ Tatu +- > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org