lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From DM Smith <dmsmith...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Lucene 2.0
Date Thu, 18 May 2006 20:28:21 GMT


Chris Hostetter wrote:
> : Could someone enumerate what needs to be done before 2.0 is released.
> :  From following this thread, it was stated that 2.0 was 1.9 with
> : deprecations removed.
> : Recently it appears to be becoming much more than that.
>
> I believe Doug's suggestion was to hold off just long enough to fix any
> egregious bugs, or apply any "safe" patches for bugs that have allready
> been fixed but not yet applied.
>
> the "2.0 is the same as 1.9 but with deprecations removed" policy was
> about features, but if there are bugs that can be fixed easily, let's fix
> them.
>
> at the monent, there are two Jira issues with a "Fix" version of 2.0 still
> unresolved: LUCENE-556 and LUCENE-546 .. presumably, unless someone marks
> any other bugs as "Fix for 2.0" 2.0 can be released once those bugs have
> been fixed, or sooner if it's decided that nbo one has the time to fix
> those (or the existing patches aren't safe to apply hastily)
>   

Both of these are unassigned. 546 has an attached patch. 556 mentions a 
work around.

Well, I am looking forward to someone else taking this on;) and getting 
2.0 out the door!

>
> ...or at least, that's the way i udnerstand it ... i'm no policy maker.
>
>
> -Hoss

I think this is in keeping with what was said here.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message