lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Lucene and Java 1.5
Date Mon, 29 May 2006 15:37:27 GMT
Could be 2.0.*.  I think that is what Hoss was saying, too.

Otis

----- Original Message ----
From: Bill Janssen <janssen@parc.com>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org; Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodnetic@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 11:17:43 AM
Subject: Re: Lucene and Java 1.5 

Boy, I'd sure like to see at least one bug-fix release for 2.0
maintain java 1.4 compatibility.  Would that be 2.1?

Bill

> This sounds reasonable to me.  I feel bad about Andi and PyLucene, but it sounds like
GCJ(X) will soon be up-to-date (the link Andi sent was from early February).  Discussion done
or?
> 
> Otis
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Chris Hostetter <hossman_lucene@fucit.org>
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 7:12:15 PM
> Subject: Re: Lucene and Java 1.5
> 
> : important new facilities. Repeating my earlier question, why should a
> : platform that is 2 years behind for java expect to be at the latest and
> : greatest level for lucene? I'd propose 2.0 (+ branched patches) be the
> : 1.4 release distribution, with 2.1 free to move up to 1.5.
> 
> I would ammend that proposal slightly...
> 
> 1a) Lucene Core 2.0.* releases garuntee java1.4 compatibility
> 1b) Lucene Contrib modules in 2.0.* releases are free to require any java
>     version they choose.
> 
> 2a) Lucene Core 2.1.* release garuntee java1.5 compatibility.
> 2b) Lucene Contrib modules in 2.1.* releases are free to require any java
>     version they choose.
> 
> -Hoss




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message