lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Karl Wettin (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-550) InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index
Date Tue, 09 May 2006 21:48:06 GMT
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=all ]

Karl Wettin updated LUCENE-550:
-------------------------------

    Attachment: src_20060509.tar.gz

Some new statistics.

* A corpus of 500 documents, 1-5K text per document.
* Placed 150 000 term and boolean queries.
* Retrieved the top <100 hits from each result.

Query alone is about 5x faster,
but 9x if you include the hits collection.

I belive that span queries will be about 10x-20x faster as the skipTo() is really really optimized.
There is a bug in my term position code, so I have not been able to messure it for real yet.

Hope to have that working and an updated class diagram for you soon.


> InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: LUCENE-550
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550
>      Project: Lucene - Java
>         Type: New Feature

>   Components: Store
>     Versions: 1.9
>     Reporter: Karl Wettin
>  Attachments: Document.java, InstanciatedIndex.java, Term.java, class_diagram.png, class_diagram.png,
src.tar.gz, src_20060509.tar.gz
>
> After fixing the bugs, it's now 4.5 -> 5 times the speed. This is true for both at
index and query time. Sorry if I got your hopes up too much. There are still things to be
done though. Might not have time to do anything with this until next month, so here is the
code if anyone wants a peek.
> Not good enough for Jira yet, but if someone wants to fool around with it, here it is.
The implementation passes a TermEnum -> TermDocs -> Fields -> TermVector comparation
against the same data in a Directory.
> When it comes to features, offsets don't exists and positions are stored ugly and has
bugs.
> You might notice that norms are float[] and not byte[]. That is me who refactored it
to see if it would do any good. Bit shifting don't take many ticks, so I might just revert
that.
> I belive the code is quite self explaining.
> InstanciatedIndex ii = ..
> ii.new InstanciatedIndexReader();
> ii.addDocument(s).. replace IndexWriter for now.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message