Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 57205 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2006 22:02:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 2006 22:02:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 67661 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2006 22:02:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 67632 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2006 22:02:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 67615 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2006 22:02:06 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:02:06 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.87.106.226] (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:02:05 -0700 Received: from ajax (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ajax.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97BCD49FE for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2006 23:01:44 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <1262757409.1144274504842.JavaMail.jira@ajax> Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 23:01:44 +0100 (BST) From: "Stefan Will (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-541) The DisjunctionMaxQuery lacks an implementation of extractTerms(). In-Reply-To: <634075397.1144274383429.JavaMail.jira@ajax> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-541?page=all ] Stefan Will updated LUCENE-541: ------------------------------- Attachment: DisjunctionMaxQuery.patch Proposed patch, as in the related bug #427 I only need this after a rewrite(), so this implementation assumes the query was rewritten beforehand. > The DisjunctionMaxQuery lacks an implementation of extractTerms(). > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: LUCENE-541 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-541 > Project: Lucene - Java > Type: Bug > Components: Search > Versions: 1.9, 2.0, 2.1 > Environment: Any > Reporter: Stefan Will > Priority: Minor > Attachments: DisjunctionMaxQuery.patch > > The DisjunctionMaxQuery lacks an implementation of extractTerms(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org