lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Doug Cutting <cutt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Benchmarkers
Date Mon, 03 Apr 2006 18:11:06 GMT
Doug Cutting wrote:
> Please make sure that analyzers are comparable between the various 
> engines you benchmark.

I just went back and re-read what you're benchmarking, and they're all 
versions of Lucene, so you're probably already using comparable 
analyzers!  Sorry for not noticing that the first time...

You might still, if you have time, try swapping in something like 
StopAnalyzer and/or turning off Field.Store.YES.  The relative speeds of 
the various implementations may vary in interesting ways, since these 
paramters may emphasize different strengths and weaknesses.  For 
example, per-token and per-term method calls may be more-or-less of a 
bottleneck in different implementations, similarly for per-character i/o 
when copying document content around.

Cheers,

Doug

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message