Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30408 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2006 15:30:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2006 15:30:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 3650 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2006 15:30:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 3085 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2006 15:30:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 3074 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2006 15:30:42 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 07:30:42 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [85.118.4.17] (HELO snorlax.uk.scalix.com) (85.118.4.17) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 07:30:40 -0800 Received: from snorlax.uk.scalix.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by snorlax.uk.scalix.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1MFUJUk005304 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:30:19 GMT Received: from snorlax.uk.scalix.com (root@localhost) by snorlax.uk.scalix.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id k1MFUJg6005302 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:30:19 GMT Received: from [10.11.108.231] (snorlax.uk.scalix.com 10.11.108.216) by snorlax.uk.scalix.com (Scalix SMTP Relay 10.0.0.175) via ESMTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:30:18 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:30:18 +0000 From: John Haxby To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: <43FC838A.30404@scalix.com> In-Reply-To: <43FC8244.4030605@apache.org> References: <40D1CD16BEEBC1418D23E23209583C3F204F6C@pdc.CommWorld.local> References: <43FC599F.1070107@getopt.org> References: <43FC7CD3.4040200@gmail.com> References: <43FC8244.4030605@apache.org> Subject: Re: wildcard search with variable length x-scalix-Hops: 1 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.4.1 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Doug Cutting wrote: > DM Smith wrote: > >> Personally, I don't want an either/or. I want a both/and. Modern unix >> shells provide both/and, albeit with different syntax. >> >> I see this more as a feature request than an argument as to the >> usefulness or properness of either. Both are useful. Both are proper. >> Both are intuitive. Both are counterintuitive. It all depends on your >> "tradition". > > +1 > > Doug > Doesn't the RegexQuery do this for you? jch --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org