Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40876 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2006 14:12:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2006 14:12:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 60127 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2006 14:11:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 59983 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2006 14:11:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 59956 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2006 14:11:52 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:11:52 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [206.190.53.29] (HELO smtp104.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com) (206.190.53.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:11:51 -0800 Received: (qmail 18304 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2006 14:11:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.6?) (dmsmith555@67.39.27.222 with plain) by smtp104.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Feb 2006 14:11:29 -0000 Message-ID: <43F336A6.8040700@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:11:50 -0500 From: DM Smith User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: 1.9 RC1 References: <43F0E8D1.8070805@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <43F0E8D1.8070805@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Not to get to far ahead, but what is the schedule relation between 1.9 and 2.0? What are the dependencies on releasing 2.0? Doug Cutting wrote: > I'd like to push out a 1.9 release candidate in the next week or so. > Are there any patches folks are really hoping to sneak into 1.9? If > so, now's the time. > > Doug --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org