Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of lucenelist2005@danielnaber.de
 designates 80.67.18.44 as permitted sender)
From: Daniel Naber <lucenelist2005@danielnaber.de>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene 1.9 RC1 release available
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:18:54 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
References: <43FB4438.8070409@apache.org> <200602252124.13349@danielnaber.de>
 <34665ECF-6069-4A4C-A87C-0E38F06C8EEC@ehatchersolutions.com>
In-Reply-To: <34665ECF-6069-4A4C-A87C-0E38F06C8EEC@ehatchersolutions.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200602261318.54696@danielnaber.de>

On Sonntag 26 Februar 2006 02:42, Erik Hatcher wrote:

> I personally don't think we should be distributing any external =C2=A0
> dependencies. =C2=A0Whoever builds the releases needs to have the =C2=A0
> dependencies locally, but 3rd party JARs, even Apache ones, should =C2=A0
> not go along for the .tar/zip ride IMO. =C2=A0

I think they should be included to make life easier for our users, unless=20
it makes Lucene too big (which is not the case for now as the files are=20
quite small).

Regards
 Daniel

=2D-=20
http://www.danielnaber.de

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org