From java-dev-return-12835-apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org Wed Feb 15 16:16:44 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 39724 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2006 16:16:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2006 16:16:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 76494 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2006 16:16:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 76466 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2006 16:16:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 76455 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2006 16:16:39 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:16:39 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [206.190.53.35] (HELO smtp110.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com) (206.190.53.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:16:39 -0800 Received: (qmail 92687 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2006 16:16:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.6?) (dmsmith555@67.39.27.222 with plain) by smtp110.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Feb 2006 16:16:17 -0000 Message-ID: <43F353EA.9030003@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:16:42 -0500 From: DM Smith User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: 1.9 RC1 References: <43F0E8D1.8070805@apache.org> <43F336A6.8040700@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Erik Hatcher wrote: > On Feb 15, 2006, at 9:11 AM, DM Smith wrote: >> Not to get to far ahead, but what is the schedule relation between >> 1.9 and 2.0? >> What are the dependencies on releasing 2.0? > > My understanding is that 2.0 will be 1.9 with all the deprecated API > removed. Maybe there are other features planned? Would that mean that 1.9 and 2.0 will be released at the same time? > > Erik > > >> >> Doug Cutting wrote: >>> I'd like to push out a 1.9 release candidate in the next week or so. >>> Are there any patches folks are really hoping to sneak into 1.9? If >>> so, now's the time. >>> >>> Doug --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org