lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik Hatcher <e...@ehatchersolutions.com>
Subject Re: Disabling Lucene's Bugzilla
Date Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:39:50 GMT
Sander,

Thanks for that information.  Since no new issues can be created,  
we'll just monitor any comments ourselves and ask that folks use JIRA  
instead.

	Erik


On Dec 14, 2005, at 12:44 PM, Sander Temme wrote:

>
> On Dec 14, 2005, at 6:09 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
>> Infrastructure,
>>
>> We have long since migrated to JIRA as our issue tracker.  Could  
>> we get our Bugzilla disabled so no new issues or comments are added?
>
> Lucene in Bugzilla is already closed for bug entry. I realize that  
> people can still edit existing bugs, and Bugzilla doesn't really  
> have a mechanism to prevent that.
>
> If preserving the history in Bugzilla is not important to the  
> project (for instance, in the case all bugs open and shut have been  
> migrated to JIRA and the remaining Bugzilla content is therefore  
> superfluous), I can just delete the product and that action should  
> take the bugs with it.
>
> S.
>
>> Thanks,
>> 	Erik
>>
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> From: bugzilla@apache.org
>>> Date: December 14, 2005 1:00:26 AM EST
>>> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>>> Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34066]  - [PATCH] Extension to binary  
>>> Fields that allows fixed byte buffer
>>> Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ·
>>> RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
>>> <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34066>.
>>> ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ·
>>> INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
>>>
>>> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34066
>>>
>>>
>>> chuck@manawiz.com changed:
>>>
>>>            What    |Removed                     |Added
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>> --------
>>>   Attachment #14515|0                           |1
>>>         is obsolete|                            |
>>>   Attachment #14521|0                           |1
>>>         is obsolete|                            |
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------- Additional Comments From chuck@manawiz.com  2005-12-14  
>>> 07:00 -------
>>> Created an attachment (id=17219)
>>>  --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi? 
>>> id=17219&action=view)
>>> Updated fixed binary field buffer patch for latest source with  
>>> test case
>>>
>>> Better late than never I hope.	FixedBufferBinaryFields.patch is  
>>> revised to
>>> apply against the latest source and now includes a test case  
>>> (extension of
>>> TestBinaryDocument).  This is my last current local patch to  
>>> Lucene, so it
>>> would be great if it gets committed.  The value again is to  
>>> eliminate copying
>>> of large binary values to be stored in the Lucene index.  For a  
>>> compressed
>>> document, for example, if the documents are read and compressed  
>>> externally in a
>>> fixed buffer and the compressed buffer is passed in, all copying  
>>> can be
>>> eliminated.
>>>
>>> Chuck
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/ 
>>> userprefs.cgi?tab=email
>>> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
>>> You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> sander@temme.net              http://www.temme.net/sander/
> PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4  B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message