Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 97061 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2005 03:28:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Nov 2005 03:28:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 40730 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2005 03:28:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 40705 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2005 03:28:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 40692 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2005 03:28:55 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 19:28:55 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of yseeley@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.201 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.201] (HELO xproxy.gmail.com) (66.249.82.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 19:28:48 -0800 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t16so75878wxc for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 19:28:34 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=S0+p8+F7YYZdSkhGoSjKA8rkwF+REc7FSmgIPenEfFJuX0WbbK7S0JcIPsO7VmDKY0/Dj6A4jk4VCHeGkZx/NukcLid9uc8/Yoyu0hKpmzm8IckQCcH/fd4jkkQQV+XuV3R4kHYfj3NyaKw20Jfl71WVLkN4LxX215Y+CAMftKU= Received: by 10.65.148.9 with SMTP id a9mr286008qbo; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 19:28:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.211.10 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:28:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:28:34 -0500 From: Yonik Seeley To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: compatibility of Lucene 1.9 In-Reply-To: <03072CBC-D8D8-47F4-9944-33031125747A@ehatchersolutions.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200511082328.03469@danielnaber.de> <03072CBC-D8D8-47F4-9944-33031125747A@ehatchersolutions.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N It's almost impossible to maintain 100% compatibility... I think the current level of compatibility is pretty good. I ran into a couple of minor things myself when upgrading to Lucene 1.9: - writeLogTimeout and commitLockTimeout are now final, so they can't be changed. - I have a class that extends Searcher, and there were new methods added to Searchable which means I had to implement those new method before my class would compile. This is expert level stuff, the needed changes took me 10 minutes, and one one should deploy a new version without thorough testing anyway (it's a years worth of changes, after all). -Yonik Now hiring -- http://forms.cnet.com/slink?231706 On 11/8/05, Erik Hatcher wrote: > Daniel, > > Thanks for clarify it, sorry for asking before I got to your > explanation. Are there other known incompatibilities? > > Erik --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org