Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 11906 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2005 13:58:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Oct 2005 13:58:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 30465 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2005 13:57:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 30361 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2005 13:57:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 30319 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2005 13:57:56 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 06:57:56 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of mamcxyz@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.204 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.204] (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 06:57:51 -0700 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q3so289156nzb for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 06:57:32 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=kdeVM0WI/oWdJivYJVUw1VE9xO1GX8lpcasg5KgOawF61GZ0RT6wnugMnedX1V1OEgfMxEU4Aafr86uGyICEXfEgzsryV5AIs4/GRmZ7otmaSYFGJ4rUpuyuxObUDbAkkSUYo5xfFoZqDk8U7yt2o1JKAOVIj1kB13uOAlbFaLI= Received: by 10.36.135.20 with SMTP id i20mr2262667nzd; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 06:57:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.91.13 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 06:57:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8a5fe2600510270657s64b94b24i@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 08:57:32 -0500 From: "Mario Alejandro M." To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Balancing metadata VS content In-Reply-To: <200510270053.21481@danielnaber.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_20087_24069806.1130421452514" References: <8a5fe2600510261543j76c42e46t@mail.gmail.com> <200510270053.21481@danielnaber.de> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_20087_24069806.1130421452514 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I know about beagle. Nice stuff, but my development is more like http://www.autonomy.com/. I don't wanna compete in the personal desktop search, but in the mini-teams= , pyme company. Search local files is only a small (but important) subset of the desired functionality.... Is for that, metadata play a bigger role here than in "normal" deployments... -- Mario Alejandro Montoya MCP www.solucionesvulcano.com !Obtenga su sitio Web din=E1mico! ------=_Part_20087_24069806.1130421452514--