Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 64731 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2005 11:42:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Oct 2005 11:42:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 95116 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2005 11:42:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 95073 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2005 11:42:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 95058 invoked by uid 99); 11 Oct 2005 11:42:06 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 04:42:06 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [128.230.18.5] (HELO mailbox.syr.edu) (128.230.18.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 04:42:08 -0700 Received: from ISTCNLPD9HB3R31 (istcnlpd9hb3r31.syr.edu [128.230.84.109]) by mailbox.syr.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j9BBfeX3022467 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 07:41:41 -0400 (EDT) From: "Grant Ingersoll" To: Subject: RE: Adding generic payloads to a Term's posting list Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 07:41:40 -0400 Message-ID: <010701c5ce58$bf7b9b40$6d54e680@ISTCNLPD9HB3R31> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <5db525fa0510110308t7aba3c12i85785089fa3ccc0@mail.gmail.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 thread-index: AcXOS7vip/JNfyL9StOO8vcQ95kL+AADKV5g X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N >From my understanding, I don't think there has been any work, except the idea put forth by Doug and others. Contributions are definitely welcome... >-----Original Message----- >From: Shane O'Sullivan [mailto:shaneosullivan1@gmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 5:08 AM >To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org >Subject: Re: Adding generic payloads to a Term's posting list > >This is precisely what I am looking for. Does anyone know if >this work is going in to Lucene 2.0? > >Shane > >On 10/10/05, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/Lucene2Whiteboard >> >> See item #11 of API changes. Maybe along the lines of what you are >> interested in, although I don't know if anyone has even attempted a >> design of it. I would also like to see this, plus the >ability to store >> info at higher levels in the Index, such as Field (not on a >per token >> basis), Document (info about the document that spans it's >fields) and >> Index (such as coreference information). Alas, no time... >> >> -Grant >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Shane O'Sullivan [mailto:shaneosullivan1@gmail.com] >> >Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 8:38 AM >> >To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org >> >Subject: Adding generic payloads to a Term's posting list >> > >> >Hi, >> > >> >To the best of my knowledge, it is not possible to add generic data >> >to a Term's posting list. >> >By this I mean info that is defined by the search engine, >not Lucene >> >itself. >> >Whereas Lucene adds some data to the posting lists, such as the >> >term's position within a document, there are many other >useful types >> >of information that could be attached to a term. >> > >> >Some examples would be in XML documents, to store the depth >of a tag >> >in the document, or font information, such as if the term >appeared in >> >a header or in the main body of text. >> > >> >Are there any plans to add such functionality to the API? If not, >> >where would be a the appropriate place to implement these >changes? I >> >presume the TermInfosWriter and TermInfosReader would have to be >> >altered, as well as the classes which call them. Could this be done >> >without having to modify the index in such a way that >standard Lucene >> >indexes couldn't read it? >> > >> >Thanks >> > >> >Shane >> > >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org