Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of martin.haye@gmail.com designates
 66.249.82.207 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=pxpXkzzXPM6SFIb+dNUKuUo2hDNy9JfouXNlF4NjzbyggIVD5kUWILZWt7Tfh3uY4rYStOFjiG+GHbaqNDbnZQLM/LMbPdwVG0+/vFYJDUOYv50lH4SjpdBnVwLdNcmF18vZpaE2o+hl9VLoqZKKgohSQiDGQ4HMwGlWEx5dLOc=
Message-ID: <2d5af94905091416391bbc9fa6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:39:41 -0700
From: Martin Haye <m1@snyder-haye.com>
Reply-To: Martin Haye <m1@snyder-haye.com>
Sender: martin.haye@gmail.com
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Custom "multi term" SpanQuery subclass issue
In-Reply-To: <9F45D8AE-B270-4C98-841A-9E0AF6204551@ehatchersolutions.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_1659_13044810.1126741181303"
References: <9F45D8AE-B270-4C98-841A-9E0AF6204551@ehatchersolutions.com>

------=_Part_1659_13044810.1126741181303
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

I had to make changes like this to get my own SpanRangeQuery and=20
SpanWildcardQuery to work properly in the larger context. Adding the rewrit=
e=20
methods wasn't too hard.

--Martin

On 9/14/05, Erik Hatcher <erik@ehatchersolutions.com> wrote:
>=20
> I'm implementing a custom SpanQuery subclass that expands into
> multiple terms (sort of like WildcardQuery). I've subclassed
> SpanQuery and overridden the rewrite method to rewrite itself into a
> SpanOrQuery. This works fine by itself as a standalone query.
>=20
> However, when my custom SpanQuery subclass is nested within a
> SpanNearQuery it is not rewritten (as SpanQuery and all the built-in
> subclasses) defer to Query.rewrite.
>=20
> What are my options in this regard?
>=20
> Should the Span*Query's that aggregate other SpanQuery's
> (SpanOrQuery, SpanNearQuery) do something like BooleanQuery.rewrite
> ()? It seems like it should just to be on the safe side and allow
> rewriting SpanQuery's.
>=20
> Thoughts?
>=20
> Thanks,
> Erik
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>=20
>

------=_Part_1659_13044810.1126741181303--