Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 64845 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2005 02:41:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Aug 2005 02:41:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 77098 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2005 02:41:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 77071 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2005 02:40:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 77058 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2005 02:40:59 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 19:40:59 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [207.115.57.46] (HELO ylpvm15.prodigy.net) (207.115.57.46) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 19:41:14 -0700 Received: from pimout7-ext.prodigy.net (pimout7-int.prodigy.net [207.115.4.147]) by ylpvm15.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j7U2f5st017410 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 22:41:05 -0400 X-ORBL: [67.65.20.111] Received: from ATHLON (adsl-67-65-20-111.dsl.austtx.swbell.net [67.65.20.111]) by pimout7-ext.prodigy.net (8.13.4 outbound domainkey aix/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7U2elWT183164 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 22:40:51 -0400 Message-Id: <4.2.2.20050829213725.03e6b138@mail.nacimiento.com> X-Sender: (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:40:40 -0500 To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org From: tjones@apache.org Subject: Re: Lucene does NOT use UTF-8. In-Reply-To: <43137CE9.5060200@apache.org> References: <0A17D76B-DF8B-40B9-84F2-1A5A0C83E053@rectangular.com> <8B302856-A72E-497D-9858-59C32B55B9ED@rectangular.com> <4F608D92-3618-48A1-849E-42D10A28BE73@rectangular.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Doug, How will the difference impact String memory allocations? Looking at the String code, I can't see where it would make an impact. Tim >I would argue that the length written be the number of characters in the >string, rather than the number of bytes written, since that can minimize >string memory allocations. > >>I'm going to take this off-list now [ ... ] > >Please don't. It's better to have a record of the discussion. > >Doug --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org