Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
From: bugzilla@apache.org
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36135]  -
    Numeric range searching with large value sets
Message-Id: <20050811160954.2589FEB@ajax.apache.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:09:54 +0200 (CEST)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36135>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36135


------- Additional Comments From randy@zillow.com  2005-08-11 18:09 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> How I cracked this nut was to manipulate numbers such that they index properly
> and then use a ConstantScoreRangeQuery
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34673

Thanks Yonik, using a filter like this will certainly work functionally but I
need range queries to perform well and filtering is kind of like full table
scans in the relational world.  In my use cases the range queries are the
primary document reduction mechanism so I wouldn't benefit from 'skip to'
implementation to avoid reading a lot of field values.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org