From java-dev-return-11400-apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org Thu Aug 04 20:44:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72269 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2005 20:44:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Aug 2005 20:44:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 8469 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2005 20:44:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 8358 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2005 20:44:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 8343 invoked by uid 99); 4 Aug 2005 20:44:30 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.87.106.226] (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 13:44:22 -0700 Received: by ajax.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 99) id 607F0E0; Thu, 4 Aug 2005 22:44:19 +0200 (CEST) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36021] - [PATCH] Contribution: A QueryParser which passes wildcard and prefix queries to analyzer X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Message-Id: <20050804204419.607F0E0@ajax.apache.org> Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 22:44:19 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36021 ------- Additional Comments From lucenebugs@danielnaber.de 2005-08-04 22:44 ------- Thanks! The following issues need to be fixed if this should become part of Lucene's core: -it doesn't work yet for fuzzy and range queries -it needs test cases (a real life test case that shows how this solves your original problem would be nice) -a better name is needed, maybe "AnalyzingQueryParser". But I'm not sure anyway whether it really should be a subclass or if it should be integrated into QueryParser. -the "we should never get here" should probably throw a runtime exception for easier debugging If you'd like to work on these issues that would be nice. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org