lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Maros Ivanco <maros_iva...@datalan.sk>
Subject Re: lucene API
Date Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:49:03 GMT

Sure. I have noticed that Lucene uses certain programming style which is
not usual. I believe, that there are some reasons for this style, so I
would
like to discuss the reasons with the author(s) first, rather than blindly
add g/setters, remove final keywords, add empty constructors, create
factories following desing patters, extract interfaces and so on.

Maros.
-----Daniel Naber <lucenelist@danielnaber.de> wrote: -----

>To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>From: Daniel Naber <lucenelist@danielnaber.de>
>Date: 17.08.2005 20:32
>Subject: Re: lucene API
>
>On Wednesday 17 August 2005 15:26, Maros Ivanco wrote:
>
>> I would personally prefer the third one, but only if the changes
>will
>> make it to the official release.
>
>Whether a patch is accepted can obviously only be decided when we see
>the
>patch, so no promises can be made.
>
>Regards
> Daniel
>
>--
>http://www.danielnaber.de
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message