lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35838] - Java NIO patch against Lucene 1.9
Date Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:27:57 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35838>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35838


rengels@tylertechinc.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Java NIO patch against      |Java NIO patch against
                   |Lucene 1.9                  |Lucene 1.9




------- Additional Comments From rengels@tylertechinc.com  2005-07-26 15:27 -------
(In reply to comment #0)

I've attached an improved NioFile and caching mechanism. One of the problems
with the earlier implementation was that the cache size could grow enemorous
(since it was a certain percentage of all outstanding segements).

The attached cache is shared by all segments and has an upper bound.

As a note, your performance improvement numbers do not jive with what I have
seen. How many simultaneous threads are you using? What was the cache size?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message