From java-dev-return-10322-apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org Fri Jun 03 15:02:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 67376 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2005 15:02:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jun 2005 15:02:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 83433 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2005 15:02:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 83418 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2005 15:02:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 83404 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2005 15:02:38 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of rbpandey@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.199 as permitted sender) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 08:02:38 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 50so1609677wri for ; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 08:02:22 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IuUCUaJLOF6uXBLaGgc5m0RZiKHUpY5O9Pk5Zcx+M8Cbsu5693hnDr/dTWhwOGPpZgF2IXl6JNpLcH0mh+CkNlnCWewKr4ddT/hA0IUlXe0e2O+XxqR8Q8MkIqXCMdDyalrUAlRM7Fl2G3IQwqPm+lgp3WRClGZ4hghMB5qSgys= Received: by 10.54.40.52 with SMTP id n52mr1176315wrn; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 07:55:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.66.6 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 07:55:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <80d298bc050603075560457bcc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 10:55:42 -0400 From: Rasik Pandey Reply-To: Rasik Pandey To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: FieldCache parser In-Reply-To: <429F38F1.7040904@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <42810728.3070105@apache.org> <429F38F1.7040904@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Doug, Based upon your changes I have reworked a contribution for efficient sorting of "long" values which I submitted some time back numbered 34563 in Bugzilla. Please let me know if you have any questions, comments, or concerns. Regards, Rus On 6/2/05, Doug Cutting wrote: > Doug Cutting wrote: > > Attached is a patch that makes it possible to supply a user-specified > > parser to FieldCache. For example, one might use this to process a dat= e > > field as ints even if was not indexed as a decimal integer. >=20 > As there were no objections, I have committed this patch. >=20 > Doug >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org