Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 84284 invoked from network); 24 May 2005 20:41:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 May 2005 20:41:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 6104 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2005 20:40:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 6071 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2005 20:40:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 6057 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2005 20:40:57 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of lucenelist@danielnaber.de designates 80.67.18.13 as permitted sender) Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (HELO smtprelay01.ispgateway.de) (80.67.18.13) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2005 13:40:56 -0700 Received: (qmail 22015 invoked from network); 24 May 2005 20:40:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO p54965DA5.dip.t-dialin.net) ([pbs]695637@[84.150.93.165]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 24 May 2005 20:40:53 -0000 From: Daniel Naber To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: ParallelReader Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 22:41:39 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <42715364.70804@apache.org> <42839DAA.9030708@apache.org> <200505122359.22514@danielnaber.de> In-Reply-To: <200505122359.22514@danielnaber.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200505242241.39745@danielnaber.de> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Thursday 12 May 2005 23:59, Daniel Naber wrote: > It seems the IllegalArgumentException is never thrown, because the > "readers" variable is never modified? Doug, is this something you plan to fix before 1.9? Regards Daniel -- http://www.danielnaber.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org