Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
From: bugzilla@apache.org
To: lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34995]  -
    Contribution: LuceneIndexAccessor
Message-Id: <20050520231949.CAA04309@ajax.apache.org>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 01:19:49 +0200 (CEST)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34995>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34995


------- Additional Comments From blizzy-keyword-apache_bugs.e23ed5@blizzy.de  2005-05-21 01:19 -------
Not really a bug. We didn't need something like that "feature" at the time. But
I can't see why it should be impossible to test with a RAMDirectory:

public void testGetWriter() throws IOException {
	Directory directory = new RAMDirectory();
	Analyzer analyzer = new StandardAnalyzer();

	// create initial index
	{
		IndexWriter writer = new IndexWriter(directory, analyzer, true);
		writer.close();
	}
		
	IndexAccessProvider accessProvider = new IndexAccessProvider(directory, analyzer);
	LuceneIndexAccessor accessor = new LuceneIndexAccessor(accessProvider);
	accessor.open();
		
	IndexWriter writer = accessor.getWriter();
	assertNotNull(writer);
	accessor.release(writer);
		
	accessor.close();
}


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org